Low pressure molding sits between two older protection methods: potting and conformal coating. Potting pours a liquid resin into a housing and then waits hours for it to cure. Conformal coating sprays a thin film across the board surface but offers limited physical protection. Low pressure molding takes a different path. A hot-melt thermoplastic, typically a polyamide derived from plant-based fatty acids, is injected at very low pressure, usually between 1.5 and 40 bar, directly into a mold that surrounds the PCB assembly. The material cools and solidifies in seconds rather than hours, forming a solid, seamless encapsulation around the components.
The practical result is a part that is waterproof to IP67 or even IP69 standards, resistant to thermal shock, chemically inert against most industrial solvents, and mechanically robust enough to absorb vibration and impact. Because the material bonds directly to the board and cable strain reliefs, it eliminates the need for a separate plastic housing in many designs, which reduces part count, assembly labor, and overall product weight.
Not every product needs overmolding, but for assemblies that face harsh environments or must meet stringent ingress protection ratings, it is often the only process that reliably hits the target. The industries below illustrate where low pressure injection molding service china providers see the strongest demand.
Designers often weigh conformal coating against low pressure molding when specifying board protection. Each has its place, and the decision should be driven by the operating environment, not by what equipment a factory happens to own.
| Factor | Conformal Coating | Low Pressure Molding |
|---|---|---|
| Protection Level | Thin film (25 to 75 microns). Guards against moisture, dust, and mild chemical exposure. | Solid encapsulation (1 mm or thicker). Waterproof to IP67/IP69, full vibration and impact protection. |
| Processing Time | Spray, then bake to cure. Cycle time ranges from 20 to 60 minutes per batch. | Inject and cool. Cycle time is 10 to 60 seconds per part. |
| Cost per Part | Lower material cost, but longer throughput time and higher labor for masking. | Higher material cost per unit, but faster throughput and no masking or curing steps. |
| Best Suited For | Dense boards with fine-pitch components where a thin, uniform film is sufficient. | Assemblies needing true waterproofing, strain relief on cables, or replacement of a housing. |
| Reworkability | Difficult to remove once cured, especially silicone-based coatings. | Thermoplastic material can be re-melted and reworked at elevated temperature. |
In practice, many products use both. A board may receive conformal coating across its surface for baseline moisture protection, then receive a low pressure overmold around connector areas and cable exits where physical strain and water ingress are the highest risk. A capable manufacturing partner should offer both processes under one roof so the protection strategy is engineered holistically rather than split across vendors.
The overmolding step itself is only one link in a longer chain. A board still needs to be fabricated, populated, tested, coated, and finally assembled into its end product. When these steps are scattered across multiple vendors, handoff delays, compatibility gaps, and accountability issues multiply. The following checklist covers what a hardware team should verify before signing with a low pressure molding for automotive electronics supplier or any other overmolding service provider.
Farway Electronic, operating from a 2,000-square-metre workshop in LongGang, Shenzhen, has built its service model around exactly the kind of integrated chain described above. Rather than offering overmolding in isolation, the company covers the full path from bare PCB fabrication through SMT and DIP assembly, conformal coating, low pressure injection molding, PCBA testing, and final box-build assembly. Four low-pressure injection molding machines run alongside two SMT lines, two DIP lines, one automated conformal-coating spraying line, and two finished-product assembly lines.
This integration matters because overmolding is irreversible. Once a board is encapsulated, rework becomes significantly harder. Farway addresses this by enforcing a testing gate before the mold: SPI solder-paste inspection, AOI, FAI first-article inspection, X-ray, ICT, and FCT functional testing are all performed while the board is still accessible. After overmolding, functional testing is repeated to confirm that the thermal and mechanical stress of the molding cycle did not induce a latent defect.
On the engineering side, Farway supports the full NPI cycle. A technical team covering electronic engineering, BOM engineering, structural engineering, procurement, and testing works with customers from DFX review through mold development and into volume production. The low pressure molding service explicitly lists support from technical consulting and engineering through product and mould development to production, which is the scope a hardware team needs when transitioning a design from prototype to manufacturable product.
The applications Farway lists for its low pressure molding service align with the high-value use cases described earlier: medical and industrial sensors, LED lighting, mobile-phone and power batteries, connector harnesses, circuit boards, and microswitches. These are all assemblies where a failed seal means a failed product in the field, and where the cost of overmolding is trivial compared to the cost of a warranty return or a safety incident.
Even with the right partner, projects go wrong when the protection strategy is treated as an afterthought. A few patterns recur often enough to be worth flagging.
Specifying overmolding too late. If the PCB layout is already frozen before the overmold is considered, there may not be enough clearance around tall components for the material to flow evenly. Overmolding should be part of the DFX review from the start, not a retrofit after the board is designed.
Skipping pre-mold testing. Overmolding a board that has a latent solder defect locks that defect inside a solid block of thermoplastic. The board will fail functional testing after molding, and at that point the only option is scrap. Always run AOI, X-ray, and FCT before the board enters the mold.
Choosing material by price alone. The cheapest thermoplastic may not have the thermal range or chemical resistance the end product demands. A medical device that undergoes autoclave sterilization needs a different durometer and thermal rating than an automotive sensor that sees under-hood temperatures. Let the application drive the material, not the unit cost.
Splitting the chain across vendors. When PCB fabrication, assembly, overmolding, and final product assembly are handled by four different companies, each handoff is a point where defects can be introduced and where accountability can be diffused. A single partner with the full chain internally can isolate problems faster and take ownership of the final result.